Video Game and Art!!

I the Article," Video Game Can Never Be Art," Roger Ebert response to Kellee Santiago's claimed- video is a form of art- that video game doesn't meet any principle to qualify as art works because art is something consider from natural like painting, poems, or movie. He argues that video is just a as simple as a game who player play the game and win the game just as simple as that without experience anything. However, Kyle Chayka, the author of," Why Video Games Are Works of Art," responses to Ebert that video games are art because they inspire us and make us feel and give us experience unreachable within the realm of the real. Kyle explains that the winning of the game just doesn't mean player done with the game because they have gone through experiencing the game. I personally have to agree with Kyle that video game is a form of art since it is visually developed based of talented artist of graphic motion and video game all contain a story behind it. Player don't just play the game and win it like "shooting" and simply like what Ebert claimed. Moreover, I strongly agree with Kyle that a person have ignore to play video game even a single time in his life can never make a clear claims about what he claims to be expert about. We can't just argue that video game can't compare to a chicken scratch in the cave of some ancient storytelling, so it can't be art. The definition of art is large enough to cover every subject that I believe if we see something as an art and it make us feel that way, it should be arts. Art doesn't have to meet those principles that Ebert point-out; thus, it doesn't have to come from natural.